• Americas

      Count on quality and consistent customer services across more than 290 data centers in North and South America.

    • EMEA

      Harness cloud and carrier-neutral data center, colocation, and interconnection solutions across Europe and Africa.

    • Customer Stories

      • XTREME-D

        Find out how XTREME-D was able to meet its objectives and has positioned itself for further growth by partnering with Digital Realty and leveraging PlatformDIGITAL®.

        Keep Reading
      • Telefónica UK

        See how they leveraged PlatformDIGITAL™ Data Hub to localise data aggregation, staging, analytics, streaming and data management to optimise data exchange and maintain data compliance.

        Keep Reading
      • Criteo

        By partnering with a company like Digital Realty, Criteo has somebody who can work with them to ensure they move a long way towards their sustainability goals

        Keep Reading
      • Join Digital

        With increasing demand for a turnkey experience, Join™ helps their customers brings the built and digital worlds together with the essential Network-as-a-Service and IT-as-a-Service offerings for Smart Buildings and Smart Workplaces.

        Keep Reading
      • AIB

        AIB, Inc., a leading data exchange and management firm serving over 1600 automotive customers, sought to diversify their cloud portfolio to realize reduced latency, increased availability, and harden security posture.

        Keep Reading
    • Data Gravity Insights Hub

      Click to learn more

    • Investor Relations

      Digital Realty owns, acquires, develops and operates data centers. The company is focused on providing data center, colocation and interconnection solutions for domestic and international customers.

    • NYSE: DLR

      $154.93

      +0.47 (+0.30%)
      * Previous Day's Close
    • Investor Relations
    • Leadership
— Blog

Value vs. Volume: Smart vs. Big Data

Don Schuett, VP of Commerical Management
October 11, 2016

A study from the University of Texas Southwestern shed valuable light on the question of whether larger pools of data always provide more answers than smaller pools of data.

As HealthITAnalytics notes, the study was conducted using electronic health record data collected from 33,000 patients in 75 regional hospitals during 2009 and 2010. Of these 33,000 patients, 12.7 percent were readmitted to a hospital within 30 days of being discharged from their first stay.

What the study found was that data collected over the course of his or her hospital stay, such as hospital-acquired infections and the patient's health stability at his or her discharge was not significantly more accurate at predicting 30-day readmission than data collected upon a patient's initial hospital admission, such as his or her health literacy, financial challenges, and behavioral health issues like smoking and dietary habits.

The researchers initially hypothesized that the data collected throughout each patient's hospital stay would better identify whether he or she would return within 30 days because conventional wisdom says that more information gives a more accurate story. When the results showed that this was not the case, they were surprised.

But what else do the results show? How can a limited amount of data enable us to make similar predictions to a larger collection of data on the same topic? The answer is the quality of the data. Bigger is not always better, and when there is too much irrelevant information available, the data that actually matters can become buried and potentially overlooked.

Healthcare providers can use this data to target their most at-risk patients and work with them to reduce their likelihood of readmission. For instance, other studies about patient readmission support the finding that better planning and communication during transitions of care could lead to a decrease in 30-day readmission. A separate study published in the American Journal of Managed Care discussed how a patient's cognitive state during his or her time in the hospital has a direct correlation to whether he or she will be readmitted.

This research carries over to the business world, too. To determine which sets of data to use to create new policies or draw other conclusions, it’s important to learn how to differentiate between the data that has predictive value and the data that is simply “noise.” Using data without determining whether it is truly useful for your purposes can lead to inaccurate and irrelevant conclusions.

In a hospital setting, these conclusions can put patients at risk of not receiving the care they need. In a business setting, it can mean time-consuming, expensive projects that do not end up boosting profits or helping the company in any way.

This may change over time as Big Data analytics tools become more robust, but even then, it’s important to remember as this study shows that more data is not always better. It’s one thing to have the data in the first place—but it’s another thing entirely to know how to use it.

Share